California was 35.1% above the U.S. median for Fish and Game Wardens. It ranked 1 of 35 state areas with a published annual median. Neither comparison adjusts for cost of living, benefits, experience, employer mix, or hours.
Price-level context
What the local median may buy
BEA's 2024 all-items price index for California was 110.7, or 10.7% above the national price level. Its housing index was 154.3.
National-price-dollar proxy
$90,399
WageScope divides the published Fish and Game Wardens median by the BEA all-items index. This is a price-level comparison, not take-home pay, a personal budget, or a quality-of-life score.
Use the local pay range, same-source bench marks, job scale, price level, and survey care marks as separate facts. This guide stays tied to SOC 33-3031 and BLS area 06.
Questions, answered
Fish and Game Wardens pay in California: common questions
What is the median wage for Fish and Game Wardens in California?
The May 2025 BLS OEWS release published a median of $100,090 per year for Fish and Game Wardens in California. This describes an occupation-area estimate, not a promised offer or an individual's pay.
Is Fish and Game Wardens pay higher in California than nationally?
California's published median was 35.1% above the U.S. median for the same occupation and release.
Does the wage estimate adjust for cost of living in California?
No. The BLS wage is nominal. WageScope separately shows BEA's 2024 all-items Regional Price Parity of 110.7 and a transparent national-price-dollar proxy.
How many Fish and Game Wardens jobs does BLS estimate in California?
From market data to your evidence
Tailor for a real Fish and Game Wardens job, not a generic wage number.
Pick an eligible listing, then MeritLog can help you prepare from experience you have confirmed. WageScope never turns a BLS estimate into a qualification or résumé claim.
What the Fish and Game Wardens median says in California
The May 2025 BLS OEWS estimate puts the Fish and Game Wardens median in California at $100,090 per year. Median means the middle of the published wage spread. It is not one worker's pay. It is not a job offer. The row is tied to SOC 33-3031 and BLS area 06.
BLS lists 330 wage and salary jobs for this exact role-place row. That is a survey estimate. It is not a count of open posts. The local mean is $96,130 per year. Mean uses all wage values behind the estimate, so high or low values can move it away from the median.
California's Fish and Game Wardens median is 35.1% above the U.S. Fish and Game Wardens median of $74,060 on the same published median. The comparison uses the same SOC code and source period. It does not add price levels, taxes, benefits, hours, or a person's work history.
This page exists because the BLS artifact has one row for SOC 33-3031 and area 06. SOC 33-3031 names Fish and Game Wardens. Area 06 names California. Both keys must match before WageScope can show or index this answer.
The 33-3031/06 row reports 330 wage and salary jobs, 0.02 jobs per 1,000 local jobs, and a 0.49 location quotient. Each value stays under the same two source keys.
For 33-3031/06, the annual median is $100,090 per year, while the matching mean is $96,130 per year. The row is published with annual and hourly fields. WageScope does not switch units to fill a blank.
BLS area 06 facts behind this Fish and Game Wardens page
Area 06 reports 18,213,700 wage and salary jobs across all covered occupations. Its annual mean is $80,690. Its annual median is $58,240. The employment RSE is 0%. The mean-wage RSE is 0.2%. These are facts for the whole area. They do not replace the 33-3031 row.
The all-jobs wage ladder in California runs from $35,950 at the 10th percentile to $159,080 at the 90th percentile. The 25th percentile is $41,600. The median is $58,240. The 75th percentile is $97,880. This is a place check, not a pay range for Fish and Game Wardens.
The source rows below are the six largest detailed roles in the bounded area file. Each keeps its own SOC code. They help a reader spot-check area 06. They do not show related skills or a path into Fish and Game Wardens.
1. Area 06, SOC 31-1120, Home Health and Personal Care Aides: 970,150 jobs, $34,320 annual median, 53.27 jobs per 1,000, and 1.92 location quotient.
2. Area 06, SOC 35-3023, Fast Food and Counter Workers: 449,840 jobs, $42,280 annual median, 24.7 jobs per 1,000, and 1 location quotient.
3. Area 06, SOC 41-2031, Retail Salespersons: 376,460 jobs, $38,440 annual median, 20.67 jobs per 1,000, and 0.82 location quotient.
Pay range
Read the California wage ladder for Fish and Game Wardens
The 10th percentile is $69,710 per year. The 25th percentile is $74,790 per year. The median is $100,090 per year. The 75th percentile is $110,780 per year. The 90th percentile is $116,330 per year.
A percentile is a rank point, not a career stage. The 10th percentile does not mean new-worker pay. The 90th percentile does not mean a wage that comes after a set number of years. The points show how the wage values spread in the source. They do not say why one job sits at one point.
The middle half runs from $74,790 per year to $110,780 per year. The 10th-to-90th span is $46,620. Use the full ladder when a job post sits far from the median.
California has a annual median of $100,090 per year. No exact state row is linked for this area. The U.S. row has $74,060 per year. WageScope keeps annual and hourly values apart.
A state comparison is not available for California. California is 35.1% above the United States on the same published median. A gap can reflect many things that are not in this row. WageScope reports the gap but does not name a cause.
The state and U.S. rows are bench marks, not replacements. They do not fill missing local facts. A state can hold many local labor markets. A national row can hold many states. Read the local row first, then use the broader rows to see scale.
California ranks 1 of 35 among states and territories with a published annual median for Fish and Game Wardens. The list keeps one SOC code, one map type, one wage metric, and one BLS release. It skips rows without the matching median.
Rank 1 of 35 is not a place score. A small wage gap can move a row several spots. The rank does not add local prices, job count, concentration, commute, taxes, or work rules. Use it only to find where the published median falls inside this like-for-like set.
The nearby rows below are the closest ranks, not chosen cities. Their pay, job counts, and local shares can differ. Open a peer page before making a deeper comparison. A title and one number are not enough for a move or pay choice.
2. Iowa has a Fish and Game Wardens median of $98,260 per year, 120 estimated jobs, and a location quotient of 2.12.
3. Indiana has a Fish and Game Wardens median of $93,990 per year, 170 estimated jobs, and a location quotient of 1.42.
4. Nevada has a Fish and Game Wardens median of $91,750 per year, 50 estimated jobs, and a location quotient of 0.85.
Where Fish and Game Wardens medians lead among states and territories
The rows below use the same SOC 33-3031, the same annual median, the same May 2025 BLS release, and the same state map type. California has the highest published median in this set, at $100,090 per year. California sits at $100,090 per year.
A pay lead is one fact. It does not show the size of the job base. It does not show how common Fish and Game Wardens is in the local mix. It also does not add local prices. The bullets keep the median, job count, and location quotient together so a high wage is not read as a full market score.
Use this list to choose a deeper pair, not to choose a place. Open the two local pages. Check the full wage ladder, the job scale, the survey care marks, and the exact BEA price row when present. A missing median stays out of this rank instead of becoming zero.
1. California has a Fish and Game Wardens median of $100,090 per year, or $0 above California. BLS lists 330 jobs there, compared with 330 in California. The location quotient is 0.49.
2. Iowa has a Fish and Game Wardens median of $98,260 per year, or $1,830 below California. BLS lists 120 jobs there, compared with 330 in California. The location quotient is 2.12.
3. Indiana has a Fish and Game Wardens median of $93,990 per year, or $6,100 below California. BLS lists 170 jobs there, compared with 330 in California. The location quotient is 1.42.
Job-base leaders
Where BLS counts the most Fish and Game Wardens jobs
Texas has the largest published state job estimate for Fish and Game Wardens in this same-source set, at 490 jobs. California has 330. The count shows covered job scale, not open posts.
A large job base can have a lower median than a smaller one. It can also have a location quotient near or below 1. That is why WageScope does not blend job count, pay, and local share. Each field keeps its name and unit. The rows below let you compare all three without making one score.
Current MeritLog listings can add a dated view of employer-title matches. They do not change this May 2025 order. A place with few current cards can still have a large BLS job estimate. A place with several cards can still have a smaller estimate. The sources use different clocks and scopes.
1. Texas has 490 estimated Fish and Game Wardens jobs, a gap of 160 jobs from California. Its median is $85,980 per year, or $14,110 below California. Its location quotient is 0.94.
2. New York has 390 estimated Fish and Game Wardens jobs, a gap of 60 jobs from California. Its median is $80,060 per year, or $20,030 below California. Its location quotient is 1.08.
3. California has 330 estimated Fish and Game Wardens jobs, a gap of 0 jobs from California. Its median is $100,090 per year, or $0 above California. Its location quotient is 0.49.
Local-share leaders
Where Fish and Game Wardens takes the largest share of local jobs
Maine has the highest published location quotient in this state set, at 7.89. California has 0.49. A value above 1 means the role's local job share is larger than its national share.
A high quotient can come from a small local job base. It does not prove more jobs, more posts, faster growth, or higher pay. The bullets keep each quotient beside its BLS job count and median. This lets a reader see when the three measures point in different ways.
Use this list to ask where Fish and Game Wardens is a large part of the local mix. Use the employment list to ask where BLS counts the most jobs. Use the pay list to ask where the median is highest. None of those lists decides where a person should work.
1. Maine has a location quotient of 7.89, a gap of 7.40 from California. BLS lists 190 Fish and Game Wardens jobs and a median of $73,260 per year, or $26,830 below California.
2. Wyoming has a location quotient of 6.91, a gap of 6.42 from California. BLS lists 70 Fish and Game Wardens jobs and a median of $74,060 per year, or $26,030 below California.
3. South Dakota has a location quotient of 5.67, a gap of 5.18 from California. BLS lists 100 Fish and Game Wardens jobs and a median of $68,810 per year, or $31,280 below California.
Job scale and share
How common Fish and Game Wardens is in California
BLS lists 330 Fish and Game Wardens jobs in California. It also lists 0.02 jobs per 1,000 local jobs. Jobs per 1,000 turns the count into a rate. It helps compare places of different size. It does not show open posts or hiring speed.
The location quotient is 0.49. A value of 1 means Fish and Game Wardens has the same share of local jobs as it has across the nation. This row is lower than 1. The quotient is a share check, not a wage or a growth measure.
Read the three values as separate facts. Employment asks how many covered jobs BLS estimated. Jobs per 1,000 asks how much of the local job base the role takes. Location quotient asks how that share compares with the national share. None of them tells you how many posts are open today.
Fish and Game Wardens beside other roles in California
The all-occupations median in California is $58,240 per year. The Fish and Game Wardens median is $100,090 per year. Fish and Game Wardens is 71.9% above the local all-occupations median on the same published median. This compares one role with the full covered job mix.
The nearby role medians below come from the bounded detailed-role table for California. They are close by wage, not by task. A small wage gap does not mean two jobs need the same skill or lead to the same career. Official titles keep their own SOC codes and source rows.
Use the list to spot the local wage mix around Fish and Game Wardens. Then open the role page you mean. A role can have a similar median and a very different job count or local share. The pay number alone cannot show fit, demand, or a path between jobs.
1. Elementary School Teachers, Except Special Education, SOC 25-2021, has a California median of $99,650 per year. BLS lists 155,160 jobs and a location quotient of 0.95.
2. Management Analysts, SOC 13-1111, has a California median of $101,460 per year. BLS lists 137,280 jobs and a location quotient of 1.3.
3. Accountants and Auditors, SOC 13-2011, has a California median of $97,050 per year. BLS lists 175,360 jobs and a location quotient of 1.03.
Area job mix
The largest detailed roles in California
Home Health and Personal Care Aides is the largest detailed occupation in the bounded California table, at 970,150 jobs. Fish and Game Wardens has 330 jobs in its exact role-place row. The two counts show where this role sits beside other large parts of the local job base.
The all-occupations job count is 18,213,700. The detailed list below is only a bounded view of that larger mix. It does not sum to every local job. It does not include a blank role as zero. It helps explain why one role's wage and job count should not stand in for the whole area.
A large role can have a lower median. A smaller role can have a higher one. Job count does not show current posts, job quality, or growth. Use the list to see local scale. Then keep Fish and Game Wardens's own median, spread, and share in their own fields.
1. Home Health and Personal Care Aides has 970,150 jobs in California, a gap of 969,820 from Fish and Game Wardens. Its median is $34,320 per year, or $65,770 below Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 1.92.
2. Fast Food and Counter Workers has 449,840 jobs in California, a gap of 449,510 from Fish and Game Wardens. Its median is $42,280 per year, or $57,810 below Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 1.
Area pay mix
Published role medians around California
Software Developers has the highest published median in the bounded California role table, at $174,410 per year. Fish and Game Wardens has $100,090 per year. This puts the role beside a local pay range without blending the source rows.
The local all-occupations median is $58,240 per year. A role above that mark is not better. A role below it is not worse. The mark only shows where the role's published median sits against the full covered job mix. Job tasks, level, hours, and work setting are separate facts.
The bullets keep each SOC title, job count, median, and local share together. Use them to find a role page worth opening. Do not use a close median as proof that two roles share skills or that one is a path to the other.
1. Software Developers has a median of $174,410 per year in California, or $74,320 above Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 284,390 jobs, compared with 330 for Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 1.44.
2. Registered Nurses has a median of $140,270 per year in California, or $40,180 above Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 338,940 jobs, compared with 330 for Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 0.86.
3. General and Operations Managers has a median of $124,390 per year in California, or $24,300 above Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 300,840 jobs, compared with 330 for Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 0.73.
Area role shares
Roles with the largest local share in California
Farmworkers and Laborers, Crop, Nursery, and Greenhouse has the highest location quotient in the bounded California role table, at 5.54. Fish and Game Wardens has 0.49. Both values compare a local job share with the matching national share.
A quotient above 1 means the role takes a larger share of local jobs than it does across the nation. It does not mean more jobs than every other role. It does not mean open posts, growth, or high pay. The job count and median beside each row answer those other narrow questions.
The local role-share mix can differ a lot from the pay mix. Read both lists. Then compare Fish and Game Wardens with the same SOC code in another place. This keeps a broad area pattern from replacing the exact role-place row.
1. Farmworkers and Laborers, Crop, Nursery, and Greenhouse has a location quotient of 5.54 in California, a gap of 5.05 from Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 172,260 jobs and a median of $35,580 per year, or $64,510 below Fish and Game Wardens.
2. Home Health and Personal Care Aides has a location quotient of 1.92 in California, a gap of 1.43 from Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 970,150 jobs and a median of $34,320 per year, or $65,770 below Fish and Game Wardens.
Price-level view
What $100,090 may mean after the California price level
BEA's 2024 all-items price index for California is 110.7. The U.S. level is 100. The local level is 10.7% above that mark. This is a broad price comparison. It is not a personal budget.
WageScope divides the $100,090 Fish and Game Wardens median by 110.7 divided by 100. The result is $90,399 in national-price dollars per year. This proxy keeps the math clear. It is not take-home pay and does not set a move target.
Housing is 154.3. Goods are 106.1. Utilities are 158.9. Other services are 102.6. The parts do not move as one. WageScope uses BEA's all-items index for the proxy and does not make its own basket.
The employment RSE for this Fish and Game Wardens row is 0.2%. The mean-wage RSE is 0.1%. RSE means relative standard error. It is a survey precision flag. A smaller value often means less sampling uncertainty. It is not the chance that one person's pay is right or wrong.
The employment RSE belongs to the 330 job estimate. The mean-wage RSE belongs to the $96,130 mean. BLS does not give the same RSE field for the median or every percentile. WageScope does not move an RSE from one field to another.
A local row can change in a new release. A small role-place sample can also have more survey uncertainty than a broad national row. Keep the May 2025 date next to the value. Do not mix a newer job post with the BLS date as if both facts came from one clock.
The job block looks for strict employer-title matches to Fish and Game Wardens. It uses a California place filter only when the public place list has an exact approved match. If that match is not safe, the page says the jobs are not narrowed to this place. A false negative is safer than showing a different role.
Each card keeps its employer, place, source, and seen date. Listings can change between visits while the survey figures stay tied to their release date. A listing range does not replace the $100,090 BLS median. The listing and survey answer different questions.
Open one listing. Check its level, work place, pay range, and needs. Then tailor with work facts you can support. Do not turn a wage, job count, rank, or price proxy into a résumé claim. The public page is read only. It does not save a job or start a draft on load.
What the Fish and Game Wardens row for California does not claim
The row does not say what one person earns. It does not promise a job, offer, raise, or move result. It does not say why the local median differs from the U.S. row. It does not add tips, bonus pay, stock, benefits, taxes, or work hours unless those items are in the BLS wage measure.
The 330 job estimate is not a live opening count. The location quotient of 0.49 is not a growth score. Rank 1 of 35 is not a place score. The 110.7 price index is not a personal budget.
Use the row for one clear task. Read the May 2025 wage spread for SOC 33-3031 in BLS area 06. Compare the same metric with the state and U.S. rows. Add the separate 2024 price level when present. Inspect a dated job match. Then use confirmed work facts for a résumé.
BLS published an employment estimate of 330 wage and salary jobs for this exact row. It is a survey estimate, not a current opening count or forecast.
Are the current job listings included in the BLS wage calculation?
No. MeritLog shows eligible live public-catalog listings separately, with their own source and observation date. Posted pay never changes the official BLS distribution.
4. Area 06, SOC 53-7062, Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand: 355,500 jobs, $44,710 annual median, 19.52 jobs per 1,000, and 1.03 location quotient.
5. Area 06, SOC 29-1141, Registered Nurses: 338,940 jobs, $140,270 annual median, 18.61 jobs per 1,000, and 0.86 location quotient.
6. Area 06, SOC 41-2011, Cashiers: 336,110 jobs, $37,100 annual median, 18.45 jobs per 1,000, and 0.93 location quotient.
4. Nevada has a Fish and Game Wardens median of $91,750 per year, or $8,340 below California. BLS lists 50 jobs there, compared with 330 in California. The location quotient is 0.85.
5. Maryland has a Fish and Game Wardens median of $89,300 per year, or $10,790 below California. BLS lists 60 jobs there, compared with 330 in California. The location quotient is 0.61.
6. Wisconsin has a Fish and Game Wardens median of $89,110 per year, or $10,980 below California. BLS lists 150 jobs there, compared with 330 in California. The location quotient is 1.42.
7. Michigan has a Fish and Game Wardens median of $87,460 per year, or $12,630 below California. BLS lists 210 jobs there, compared with 330 in California. The location quotient is 1.27.
8. Texas has a Fish and Game Wardens median of $85,980 per year, or $14,110 below California. BLS lists 490 jobs there, compared with 330 in California. The location quotient is 0.94.
4. Florida has 290 estimated Fish and Game Wardens jobs, a gap of 40 jobs from California. Its median is $31,200 per year, or $68,890 below California. Its location quotient is 0.79.
5. Tennessee has 220 estimated Fish and Game Wardens jobs, a gap of 110 jobs from California. Its median is $75,930 per year, or $24,160 below California. Its location quotient is 1.77.
6. Michigan has 210 estimated Fish and Game Wardens jobs, a gap of 120 jobs from California. Its median is $87,460 per year, or $12,630 below California. Its location quotient is 1.27.
7. Georgia has 200 estimated Fish and Game Wardens jobs, a gap of 130 jobs from California. Its median is $79,440 per year, or $20,650 below California. Its location quotient is 1.08.
8. Maine has 190 estimated Fish and Game Wardens jobs, a gap of 140 jobs from California. Its median is $73,260 per year, or $26,830 below California. Its location quotient is 7.89.
4. Hawaii has a location quotient of 4.89, a gap of 4.40 from California. BLS lists 110 Fish and Game Wardens jobs and a median of $69,250 per year, or $30,840 below California.
5. West Virginia has a location quotient of 4.26, a gap of 3.77 from California. BLS lists 110 Fish and Game Wardens jobs and a median of $62,530 per year, or $37,560 below California.
6. Montana has a location quotient of 3.79, a gap of 3.30 from California. BLS lists 70 Fish and Game Wardens jobs and a median of $59,490 per year, or $40,600 below California.
7. Vermont has a location quotient of 3.55, a gap of 3.06 from California. BLS lists 40 Fish and Game Wardens jobs and a median of $74,940 per year, or $25,150 below California.
8. Idaho has a location quotient of 3.49, a gap of 3.00 from California. BLS lists 110 Fish and Game Wardens jobs and a median of $73,200 per year, or $26,890 below California.
4. Business Operations Specialists, All Other, SOC 13-1199, has a California median of $87,570 per year. BLS lists 155,000 jobs and a location quotient of 1.22.
5. Sales Representatives of Services, Except Advertising, Insurance, Financial Services, and Travel, SOC 41-3091, has a California median of $80,850 per year. BLS lists 156,110 jobs and a location quotient of 1.06.
6. First-Line Supervisors of Office and Administrative Support Workers, SOC 43-1011, has a California median of $77,590 per year. BLS lists 149,230 jobs and a location quotient of 0.89.
7. Sales Representatives, Wholesale and Manufacturing, Except Technical and Scientific Products, SOC 41-4012, has a California median of $76,490 per year. BLS lists 134,800 jobs and a location quotient of 0.93.
8. General and Operations Managers, SOC 11-1021, has a California median of $124,390 per year. BLS lists 300,840 jobs and a location quotient of 0.73.
3. Retail Salespersons has 376,460 jobs in California, a gap of 376,130 from Fish and Game Wardens. Its median is $38,440 per year, or $61,650 below Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 0.82.
4. Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand has 355,500 jobs in California, a gap of 355,170 from Fish and Game Wardens. Its median is $44,710 per year, or $55,380 below Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 1.03.
5. Registered Nurses has 338,940 jobs in California, a gap of 338,610 from Fish and Game Wardens. Its median is $140,270 per year, or $40,180 above Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 0.86.
6. Cashiers has 336,110 jobs in California, a gap of 335,780 from Fish and Game Wardens. Its median is $37,100 per year, or $62,990 below Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 0.93.
7. Office Clerks, General has 311,490 jobs in California, a gap of 311,160 from Fish and Game Wardens. Its median is $48,460 per year, or $51,630 below Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 1.08.
8. Stockers and Order Fillers has 310,870 jobs in California, a gap of 310,540 from Fish and Game Wardens. Its median is $42,870 per year, or $57,220 below Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 0.94.
4. Management Analysts has a median of $101,460 per year in California, or $1,370 above Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 137,280 jobs, compared with 330 for Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 1.3.
5. Elementary School Teachers, Except Special Education has a median of $99,650 per year in California, or $440 below Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 155,160 jobs, compared with 330 for Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 0.95.
6. Accountants and Auditors has a median of $97,050 per year in California, or $3,040 below Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 175,360 jobs, compared with 330 for Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 1.03.
7. Business Operations Specialists, All Other has a median of $87,570 per year in California, or $12,520 below Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 155,000 jobs, compared with 330 for Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 1.22.
8. Sales Representatives of Services, Except Advertising, Insurance, Financial Services, and Travel has a median of $80,850 per year in California, or $19,240 below Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 156,110 jobs, compared with 330 for Fish and Game Wardens. Its location quotient is 1.06.
3. Cooks, Fast Food has a location quotient of 1.66 in California, a gap of 1.17 from Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 124,440 jobs and a median of $42,050 per year, or $58,040 below Fish and Game Wardens.
4. Software Developers has a location quotient of 1.44 in California, a gap of 0.95 from Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 284,390 jobs and a median of $174,410 per year, or $74,320 above Fish and Game Wardens.
5. Security Guards has a location quotient of 1.33 in California, a gap of 0.84 from Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 199,480 jobs and a median of $43,240 per year, or $56,850 below Fish and Game Wardens.
6. Management Analysts has a location quotient of 1.3 in California, a gap of 0.81 from Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 137,280 jobs and a median of $101,460 per year, or $1,370 above Fish and Game Wardens.
7. Business Operations Specialists, All Other has a location quotient of 1.22 in California, a gap of 0.73 from Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 155,000 jobs and a median of $87,570 per year, or $12,520 below Fish and Game Wardens.
8. Office Clerks, General has a location quotient of 1.08 in California, a gap of 0.59 from Fish and Game Wardens. BLS lists 311,490 jobs and a median of $48,460 per year, or $51,630 below Fish and Game Wardens.
Fish and Game Wardens pay in California | BLS 2025
Current jobs
Precise employer-title matches for Fish and Game Wardens in California
Filtered through MeritLog's approved California place record and a strict employer-title rule. Listings are not classified by BLS and remain separate from BLS and BEA estimates.
