How much do food processing workers, all other make?

What the national Food Processing Workers, All Other median says

The May 2025 BLS OEWS estimate puts the U.S. median for Food Processing Workers, All Other at $39,680 per year. Median means the middle. Half of the wage values used for this estimate fall below that point. Half fall above it. The median is not one worker's pay. It is not a job offer. It is one clear mark for the middle of a broad national pay range.

BLS also lists 65,000 wage and salary jobs for Food Processing Workers, All Other. That count covers jobs in the survey's scope. It does not count open job ads. It also leaves out people who work for themselves. The wage and job counts share the same May 2025 reference point, so they can be read together without mixing time periods.

The Food Processing Workers, All Other mean of $40,300 per year is 1.6% above the $39,680 median on the same published median. Mean means BLS adds the wage values and divides the total by the number of jobs behind the estimate. A gap between mean and median shows that the shape is not even. It does not explain the cause of the gap.

The fields that make SOC 51-3099 its own page

BLS names this record Food Processing Workers, All Other and gives it SOC 51-3099. The two-part code is the stable key for this page. A role with a close name keeps a different code, wage row, job count, and area pattern. WageScope never joins two SOC records because their words sound alike.

For SOC 51-3099, the U.S. row reports 65,000 wage and salary jobs. Its annual median is $39,680 per year. Its matching mean is $40,300 per year. These facts come from one national row and one May 2025 release.

SOC 51-3099 appears in 46 state or territory rows. It also has 150 metro rows and 69 nonmetro rows. A missing local row stays missing. We do not fill it with U.S. data or data for a similar job code.

• SOC 51-3099 10th percentile: $32,210 per year.
• SOC 51-3099 25th percentile: $36,410 per year.
• SOC 51-3099 median: $39,680 per year.
• SOC 51-3099 75th percentile: $44,130 per year.
• SOC 51-3099 90th percentile: $47,950 per year.
• SOC 51-3099 employment RSE: 2%. Mean-wage RSE: 0.3%.
• SOC 51-3099 has no national suppression mark in the fields shown on this page.

Read the Food Processing Workers, All Other wage ladder from low to high

The 10th percentile is $32,210 per year. The 25th percentile is $36,410 per year. The median is $39,680 per year. The 75th percentile is $44,130 per year. The 90th percentile is $47,950 per year. Each point marks a place in the same national wage spread.

A percentile is a rank point. It is not a career step. For example, the 10th percentile means 10% of wage values are at or below that mark. It does not mean a new worker starts there. The 90th percentile means 90% are at or below that mark. It does not mean a worker can reach it after a set number of years.

The middle half runs from $36,410 to $44,130 per year. That span is $7,720. The full 10th-to-90th span is $15,740. These spans show why one median cannot stand in for every Food Processing Workers, All Other job.

What the gaps around the Food Processing Workers, All Other median show

The median is 23.2% above the 10th percentile. The 90th percentile is 20.8% above the median. The two sides do not have to match. A wider upper side can pull the mean up. A wider lower side can pull it down. The data shows the shape, but not the reason for that shape.

The 25th-to-median step is $3,270 per year. The median-to-75th step is $4,450 per year. These two steps give a closer look at the middle half. They are often more useful than a single top-to-bottom gap because they keep the center in view.

Use this ladder as a fact check when you read a job post. A posted range can sit below, near, or above these BLS marks. That does not make the post wrong. A job may differ by place, hours, level, field, employer, or work rules. Keep the posted range tied to that listing. Keep the BLS range tied to the whole occupation.

Metro areas with the highest published Food Processing Workers, All Other medians

WageScope found 150 metro rows with the same published annual median for Food Processing Workers, All Other. It sorts only those rows. It does not fill a blank row. It does not turn a blank into zero. The first six rows below have the highest published medians in this release. The list is a wage rank, not a rank of places to live or work.

The first row is Rochester, MN, at $62,330 per year. The middle metro row by published pay is Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX, at $38,870 per year. That middle metro mark gives one more check on how far the top rows sit from a common place in the set.

These are nominal wages. Nominal means the dollar amount shown in the source. This list does not adjust for local price levels. It also does not tell us how many openings an area has now. Use a local page to see price-level context when an exact BEA row exists. Use the separate job block to inspect current employer-title matches.

• 1. Rochester, MN has a Food Processing Workers, All Other median of $62,330 per year, or $22,650 above the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. BLS lists 60 jobs there, against 65,000 across the U.S. The local location quotient is 1.26.
• 2. Hanford-Corcoran, CA has a Food Processing Workers, All Other median of $53,420 per year, or $13,740 above the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. BLS lists 120 jobs there, against 65,000 across the U.S. The local location quotient is 6.08.
• 3. Lancaster, PA has a Food Processing Workers, All Other median of $51,490 per year, or $11,810 above the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. BLS lists 190 jobs there, against 65,000 across the U.S. The local location quotient is 1.79.
• 4. Longview-Kelso, WA has a Food Processing Workers, All Other median of $50,500 per year, or $10,820 above the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. BLS lists 50 jobs there, against 65,000 across the U.S. The local location quotient is 3.12.
• 5. Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA has a Food Processing Workers, All Other median of $50,310 per year, or $10,630 above the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. BLS lists 90 jobs there, against 65,000 across the U.S. The local location quotient is 0.67.
• 6. Boulder, CO has a Food Processing Workers, All Other median of $48,850 per year, or $9,170 above the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. BLS lists 60 jobs there, against 65,000 across the U.S. The local location quotient is 0.76.

Metro areas with the largest Food Processing Workers, All Other job estimates

A large wage can appear in a small job market. A large job market can have a lower wage. That is why WageScope keeps pay and job count in separate views. The six rows below have the largest published employment estimates for Food Processing Workers, All Other among metro rows in this release. Employment means the number of wage and salary jobs in scope. It does not mean open roles.

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA has the largest listed metro estimate in this set, at 2,530 jobs. Its median is $37,280 per year. Compare that with Rochester, MN, which leads the published median list. The leaders may match, or they may not. Each list answers a different question.

Job count can help you see the scale of a local labor market. It cannot show churn, new hiring, job quality, remote work, or the chance that one person will get hired. Current listings add a second view, but they are a dated sample of posts. WageScope never turns the listing count into a demand score.

• 1. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA has 2,530 estimated Food Processing Workers, All Other jobs. That is 3.9% of the U.S. estimate of 65,000 jobs. Its median is $37,280 per year, or $2,400 below the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. Its location quotient is 0.97.
• 2. Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA has 1,920 estimated Food Processing Workers, All Other jobs. That is 3.0% of the U.S. estimate of 65,000 jobs. Its median is $36,660 per year, or $3,020 below the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. Its location quotient is 1.59.
• 3. Sioux City, IA-NE-SD has 1,710 estimated Food Processing Workers, All Other jobs. That is 2.6% of the U.S. estimate of 65,000 jobs. Its median is $46,350 per year, or $6,670 above the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. Its location quotient is 54.67.
• 4. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN has 1,150 estimated Food Processing Workers, All Other jobs. That is 1.8% of the U.S. estimate of 65,000 jobs. Its median is $42,840 per year, or $3,160 above the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. Its location quotient is 0.61.
• 5. Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX has 1,030 estimated Food Processing Workers, All Other jobs. That is 1.6% of the U.S. estimate of 65,000 jobs. Its median is $38,100 per year, or $1,580 below the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. Its location quotient is 0.75.
• 6. Gainesville, GA has 990 estimated Food Processing Workers, All Other jobs. That is 1.5% of the U.S. estimate of 65,000 jobs. Its median is $35,670 per year, or $4,010 below the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. Its location quotient is 22.84.

Where Food Processing Workers, All Other has a larger share of local jobs

Location quotient is a share check. A value of 1 means the role has the same share of local jobs as it has across the nation. A value above 1 means the local share is larger. A value below 1 means the local share is smaller. It is not a count. It is not a wage. It does not say that a place is growing.

Sioux City, IA-NE-SD has the highest published location quotient in this bounded metro set, at 54.67. The same row lists 1,710 jobs and a median of $46,350 per year. Reading all three values keeps a high share from being mistaken for a large market or high pay.

A small area can have a high location quotient because the role makes up a large part of a small local job base. A large area can have many workers and a lower quotient. Use the quotient to ask where the role is common in the mix. Use employment to ask how many jobs BLS estimated. Use the wage fields to ask what the published pay range looks like.

• 1. Sioux City, IA-NE-SD has a Food Processing Workers, All Other location quotient of 54.67. BLS lists 1,710 jobs and a median of $46,350 per year, or $6,670 above the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. The U.S. job estimate is 65,000.
• 2. Gainesville, GA has a Food Processing Workers, All Other location quotient of 22.84. BLS lists 990 jobs and a median of $35,670 per year, or $4,010 below the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. The U.S. job estimate is 65,000.
• 3. Morristown, TN has a Food Processing Workers, All Other location quotient of 19.23. BLS lists 380 jobs and a median of $46,320 per year, or $6,640 above the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. The U.S. job estimate is 65,000.
• 4. Hammond, LA has a Food Processing Workers, All Other location quotient of 12.97. BLS lists 260 jobs and a median of $36,620 per year, or $3,060 below the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. The U.S. job estimate is 65,000.
• 5. Monroe, LA has a Food Processing Workers, All Other location quotient of 7.78. BLS lists 280 jobs and a median of $31,250 per year, or $8,430 below the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. The U.S. job estimate is 65,000.
• 6. Hanford-Corcoran, CA has a Food Processing Workers, All Other location quotient of 6.08. BLS lists 120 jobs and a median of $53,420 per year, or $13,740 above the U.S. Food Processing Workers, All Other median. The U.S. job estimate is 65,000.

How Food Processing Workers, All Other sits in Production

Food Processing Workers, All Other is SOC 51-3099. BLS places it in the Production major group. Among 105 detailed roles in that group with a published annual median, Food Processing Workers, All Other ranks 89 of 105 by median. This is a pay rank inside one source family. It is not a rank of skill, value, status, or career fit.

The closest same-family medians help set a fair peer frame. They do not claim that the work is the same. Official SOC titles can cover different tasks and settings. WageScope uses the family only because BLS publishes that link. It does not infer a career move, a skill match, or a hiring path from the wage gap.

Use these peer rows to spot whether the $39,680 median sits near many family roles or far from them. Then open a role's own page before using its number. Each role has a different code, job count, wage spread, and place pattern. One family label does not erase those facts.

• 1. Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders, SOC 51-6063, has a U.S. median of $39,530 per year. Its gap from Food Processing Workers, All Other is $150 per year.
• 2. Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians, SOC 51-9083, has a U.S. median of $39,460 per year. Its gap from Food Processing Workers, All Other is $220 per year.
• 3. Production Workers, All Other, SOC 51-9199, has a U.S. median of $40,110 per year. Its gap from Food Processing Workers, All Other is $430 per year.
• 4. Slaughterers and Meat Packers, SOC 51-3023, has a U.S. median of $40,130 per year. Its gap from Food Processing Workers, All Other is $450 per year.
• 5. Butchers and Meat Cutters, SOC 51-3021, has a U.S. median of $40,140 per year. Its gap from Food Processing Workers, All Other is $460 per year.
• 6. Helpers--Production Workers, SOC 51-9198, has a U.S. median of $39,070 per year. Its gap from Food Processing Workers, All Other is $610 per year.

How much care to use with the Food Processing Workers, All Other estimate

The relative standard error for the job count is 2%. For the mean wage it is 0.3%. This measure, called RSE, shows survey precision. A smaller RSE often means less uncertainty from the sample. It does not tell you whether one person's pay is right or wrong.

The employment RSE applies to the 65,000 job estimate. The mean-wage RSE applies to the published mean of $40,300 per year. These fields do not give a matching RSE for the median or each percentile. WageScope shows the fields BLS published and does not move one RSE to another measure.

Survey values can change when BLS changes its methods, sample, models, or source year. That is why we show May 2025 on this page. Before we use a new release, we check its files, rows, and pages. A changed number is only a correction if the source calls it one.

A simple way to compare Food Processing Workers, All Other across places

First, compare the same wage metric. Use annual with annual or hourly with hourly. Next, check the source date. Keep May 2025 BLS rows together. Then read employment and location quotient beside pay. This stops a high median from standing in for market size or local share. Last, add BEA price-level context only when the exact place has an approved row.

A state, metro, and nonmetro area are not the same kind of map. Do not rank them in one list without saying so. WageScope groups like with like. It also keeps a national row as a broad bench mark. A local page can show the local row, its state row when that link is exact, and the U.S. row without blending them.

If a value is blank, keep it blank. If BLS marks a top code, read it as a lower bound. Do not fill a blank from a nearby place. Do not turn a wage gap into a claim about taxes, hours, benefits, work rules, or a household budget. Those facts are not in the OEWS row.

Move from Food Processing Workers, All Other wage data to one real listing

The job block on this page uses a strict employer-title match for Food Processing Workers, All Other. It may show fewer rows than the full MeritLog job search. That is on purpose. A false negative is safer here than a job card for a different role. Each card keeps its employer, place, source, and seen date. The cards do not change the BLS wage data.

Open one listing and read its own pay, work place, level, and needs. Compare its posted range with the BLS spread only as context. A posted range is set by an employer for one role. The BLS range is a survey view across many jobs. Neither source proves that a person is fit for the work.

When you tailor a résumé, use work facts you can back up. Do not turn $39,680 into a skill or result. Do not copy a BLS job count into your work history. MeritLog can help shape confirmed experience for a chosen listing. The wage page stays public and read only. It does not save a job or create a résumé on page load.

What this Food Processing Workers, All Other page does not claim

This page does not say what one Food Processing Workers, All Other worker earns. It does not promise that a job pays the median. It does not state a starting wage. It does not explain why the mean and median differ. It does not add benefits, tips, stock, bonus pay, taxes, or work hours unless BLS includes them in the published wage measure.

The page does not count people who work for themselves. It does not turn 65,000 into current openings. It does not read private MeritLog jobs or Career Memory. MeritLog does not use the page to build a private career profile. While public analytics are on, GA4, Ahrefs, and Meta may get this page's URL. Use Your Privacy Choices or Global Privacy Control to turn that off. The page does not send its text to a model.

The best use is narrow and clear. Read the May 2025 BLS wage range. Check how the role changes by place. Add the separate 2024 BEA price level when an exact row exists. Inspect a dated employer-title match. Then make a résumé choice from facts you have confirmed. Keep each source tied to the question it can answer.